The Peer Review System is Broken.
We Fixed It.
2 working days. Zero bias. 100% verification.
Your research deserves objective evaluation by a minimum of 10,000 expert mechanisms, under strict scholarly supervision—not subjective judgment by 1-3 overworked humans waiting 6-12 months.
The Crisis in Three Numbers
papers retracted in 2023 alone—all "peer-reviewed"
average wait for traditional peer review decision
variation in acceptance rates for identical papers (staggering human bias)
The Solution in Three Numbers
AI attention mechanisms, at minimum, reviewing your work
from submission to comprehensive decision
bias—AI doesn't care about your name, religion, age, sex, color, ethnicity, institution, reputation, or nationality
Fast Publication, Permanent Presence
2 Days
Review complete
Comprehensive evaluation with detailed feedback
2 Weeks
Published with DOI
Dedicated permanent webpage, indexed in Crossref, Google Scholar, Semantic Scholar, AlexOpen
Forever
Open access
You retain copyright, freely accessible worldwide
From submission to permanent, citable, discoverable publication—in 2 weeks.
How It Works: 5 Steps, Fast Results
Step 1: Citation Integrity
AI verifies 100% of your citations against 100% of your paper
Traditional review: ~5% of citations spot-checked
Step 2: Plagiarism Screening
AI scans your paper against tens of millions of sources
Traditional review: 91% of reviewers don't check at all
Step 3: Quality Evaluation
AI scores your work systematically using comprehensive academic standards
Traditional review: Subjective "accept/reject" with vague reasoning
Step 4: Comprehensive Report
AI compiles all findings into detailed report with specific feedback
Traditional review: Brief comments, often contradictory
Step 5: Personalized Communication
AI generates tailored feedback email with actionable guidance
Traditional review: Often dismissive, vague, or harsh
Total Time: 2 working days. Total Coverage: 100% of your paper.
What We Eliminate
Sex Bias
Studies show papers with female-sounding names rated 7-14% lower by human reviewers.
AIR doesn't care about your sex.
Institutional Bias
Papers from Harvard accepted 35% more often than identical papers from state colleges.
AIR doesn't care about your institution.
Geographic Bias
Researchers from developing countries face rejection rates 15-25% higher than US/Europe.
AIR doesn't care about your location.
Confirmation Bias
Reviewers favor papers supporting their own theories, reject contradictory findings.
AIR doesn't have theories to defend.
Linguistic Bias
Non-native English speakers face 15-25% higher rejection rates for equivalent quality.
AIR evaluates ideas, not prose style.
The "Reviewer 2" Problem
Arbitrary rejections, unreasonable demands, personal vendettas.
AIR applies consistent rigorous standards to everyone.
Your research. Evaluated fairly. Finally.
Ready to Experience Objective Review?
No 6-month waits. No mysterious rejections. No Reviewer 2.
Just fair, fast, rigorous evaluation of your work.
Total cost if accepted
From submission to decision
Bias in evaluation
*Papers requiring revisions: first resubmission free within 7 days; after 7 days or 2nd+ resubmissions $10 each. Rejected papers: $10 all resubmissions.